0.07/0.09	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.09	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.09/0.29	% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
0.09/0.29	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.29	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.29	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.29	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.29	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.09/0.29	% WCLimit    : 240
0.09/0.29	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:31:34 EDT 2025
0.09/0.29	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.39	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.14/0.40	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IoQDpM0hkb/E---3.1_8937.p
0.14/0.44	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.14/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
0.14/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.14/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.14/0.44	# Starting sh3l with 240s (1) cores
0.14/0.44	# Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 240s (1) cores
0.14/0.44	# Starting full_lambda_8 with 240s (1) cores
0.14/0.44	# sh3l with pid 9016 completed with status 0
0.14/0.44	# Result found by sh3l
0.14/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
0.14/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.14/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.14/0.44	# Starting sh3l with 240s (1) cores
0.14/0.44	# SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
0.14/0.44	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMSNN
0.14/0.44	# partial match(2): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
0.14/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.14/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 62s (1) cores
0.14/0.44	# new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 9020 completed with status 0
0.14/0.44	# Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
0.14/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
0.14/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.14/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.14/0.44	# Starting sh3l with 240s (1) cores
0.14/0.44	# SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
0.14/0.44	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMSNN
0.14/0.44	# partial match(2): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
0.14/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.14/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 62s (1) cores
0.14/0.44	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.14/0.44	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.14/0.44	
0.14/0.44	# Proof found!
0.14/0.44	# SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.44	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_23, type, cONE: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_24, type, cSUCC: (($i > $o) > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_25, type, cZERO: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_2: ($i > $i) > ($i > $i) > $i).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_27, type, epred1_0: $i > $o).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_28, type, esk2_1: $i > $i).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_29, type, esk3_1: $i > $i).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_30, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.14/0.44	thf(decl_31, type, esk5_0: $i).
0.14/0.44	thf(cSUCC_def, axiom, ((cSUCC)=(^[X3:($i > $o) > $o, X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X2)&(X3 @ (^[X4:$i]:((((X4)!=(X2))&(X1 @ X4)))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IoQDpM0hkb/E---3.1_8937.p', cSUCC_def)).
0.14/0.44	thf(cZERO_def, axiom, ((cZERO)=(^[X1:$i > $o]:(~(?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IoQDpM0hkb/E---3.1_8937.p', cZERO_def)).
0.14/0.44	thf(cONE_def, axiom, ((cONE)=(^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X13:$i]:(((Z0 @ X13)&(~(?[X12:$i]:(((((X12)!=(X13))&(Z0 @ X12))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IoQDpM0hkb/E---3.1_8937.p', cONE_def)).
0.14/0.44	thf(cX6101_EXT_pme, conjecture, (![X5:$i > $i, X6:$i > $i]:((![X2:$i]:(((X5 @ X2)=(X6 @ X2)))=>((X5)=(X6))))=>((cONE)=(^[X7:$i > $o]:(?[X8:$i]:(((X7)=(( ^[X2:$i, X8:$i]:(((X2)=(X8))) ) @ X8))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IoQDpM0hkb/E---3.1_8937.p', cX6101_EXT_pme)).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((cSUCC)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:($i > $o) > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:$i]:(((Z1 @ X2)&(Z0 @ (^[Z2/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z2)!=(X2))&(Z1 @ Z2)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cSUCC_def])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((cZERO)=(^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X2:$i]:((Z0 @ X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cZERO_def])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_6, axiom, ((cONE)=(^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X13:$i]:(((Z0 @ X13)&(~(?[X12:$i]:(((((X12)!=(X13))&(Z0 @ X12))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[cONE_def, c_0_4]), c_0_5])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~((![X5:$i > $i, X6:$i > $i]:((![X2:$i]:(((X5 @ X2)=(X6 @ X2)))=>((X5)=(X6))))=>![X16:$i > $o]:((?[X14:$i]:(((X16 @ X14)&~(?[X15:$i]:((((X15)!=(X14))&(X16 @ X15))))))<=>?[X8:$i]:(![X17:$i]:(((X16 @ X17)<=>((X8)=(X17))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cX6101_EXT_pme])]), c_0_6])])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X18:$i > $i, X19:$i > $i, X22:$i, X24:$i, X27:$i, X29:$i]:(((((X18 @ (esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19))!=(X19 @ (esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19)))|((X18)=(X19)))&((((~(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)!=(esk3_1 @ X24))|(((esk2_1 @ X22)!=(X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22)))&((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)=(esk3_1 @ X24))|(((esk2_1 @ X22)!=(X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22))))&((~(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)!=(esk3_1 @ X24))|((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22)))&((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)=(esk3_1 @ X24))|((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22)))))&(((~(epred1_0 @ X29)|((esk5_0)=(X29))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0))&(((esk5_0)!=(X29))|(epred1_0 @ X29)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)))&((~(epred1_0 @ X29)|((esk5_0)=(X29))|(((X27)=(esk4_0))|~(epred1_0 @ X27)))&(((esk5_0)!=(X29))|(epred1_0 @ X29)|(((X27)=(esk4_0))|~(epred1_0 @ X27)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((esk5_0)!=(X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2)|((X4)=(esk4_0))|((esk5_0)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|((X2)=(esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((X2)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|((X2)=(esk3_1 @ X2))|((esk2_1 @ X4)!=(X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])]), c_0_12])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk4_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_17])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|((X2)!=(esk3_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|((X2)!=(esk3_1 @ X2))|((esk2_1 @ X4)!=(X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), c_0_12])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk2_1 @ X2)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_20]), c_0_12])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_22])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((esk5_0)=(X2))|((X4)=(esk4_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk5_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])]), c_0_12])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk5_0)=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_26])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))), inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_29]), c_0_26])])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|((esk4_0)=(esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_30])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_32]), c_0_26])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk2_1 @ X2)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_32]), c_0_26])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_33])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ((esk4_0)=(esk5_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35])]), c_0_26])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((X2)=(esk5_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_36])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_28])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk5_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_39])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_40]), c_0_26])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0)), inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_41])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_42]), c_0_26])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_42]), c_0_26])])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_43])).
0.14/0.44	thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45])]), c_0_26])]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.44	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.44	# Parsed axioms                        : 7
0.14/0.44	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
0.14/0.44	# Initial clauses                      : 9
0.14/0.44	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.14/0.44	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
0.14/0.44	# Processed clauses                    : 228
0.14/0.44	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.14/0.44	# ...subsumed                          : 104
0.14/0.44	# ...remaining for further processing  : 123
0.14/0.44	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 76
0.14/0.44	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.44	# Backward-subsumed                    : 44
0.14/0.44	# Backward-rewritten                   : 48
0.14/0.44	# Generated clauses                    : 1105
0.14/0.44	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 781
0.14/0.44	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.44	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
0.14/0.44	# Paramodulations                      : 974
0.14/0.44	# Factorizations                       : 35
0.14/0.44	# NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.44	# Equation resolutions                 : 78
0.14/0.44	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.14/0.44	# Total rewrite steps                  : 341
0.14/0.44	# ...of those cached                   : 338
0.14/0.44	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.44	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.44	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.44	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.44	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.44	# Current number of processed clauses  : 20
0.14/0.44	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.14/0.44	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.44	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.14/0.44	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
0.14/0.44	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 132
0.14/0.44	# ...number of literals in the above   : 656
0.14/0.44	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.44	# Current number of archived clauses   : 101
0.14/0.44	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1304
0.14/0.44	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 405
0.14/0.44	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 161
0.14/0.44	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
0.14/0.44	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.44	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
0.14/0.44	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.14/0.44	# Condensation attempts                : 228
0.14/0.44	# Condensation successes               : 10
0.14/0.44	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 19301
0.14/0.44	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 399
0.14/0.44	
0.14/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.44	# User time                : 0.031 s
0.14/0.44	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.14/0.44	# Total time               : 0.035 s
0.14/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1904 pages
0.14/0.44	
0.14/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.44	# User time                : 0.032 s
0.14/0.44	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.14/0.44	# Total time               : 0.037 s
0.14/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
0.14/0.44	% E exiting
0.14/0.44	% E exiting
0.14/0.44	EOF